Like A Croupier On Strike, Labor Is Refusing To Deal On The SSM Plebiscite

In case you’ve missed the past month of politicking, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull & Co. have been warning the Australian public that marriage equality might be a far bloody way away if their dang plebiscite doesn’t go through. Still, it ain’t going nowhere without crossbench support, which Labor has been very unwilling (read: not at all willing) to give, and Bill Shorten’s posse hasn’t showed any sign of relenting.

So, today’s meeting between Attorney-General George Brandis and his ALP counterpart Mark Dreyfus was meant to provide a pathway for the plebiscite to move forward in some sort of mutually beneficial manner. 

Of course, because this is Australian politics, a bipartisan solution was brokered within hours Labor stonewalled the ever-living shit out of any kind of compromise, effectively sticking with their plan to introduce a marriage equality bill in Parliament sans a plebiscite. 
Here’s some footage we snuck out of the room:

Senator Brandis said he tried to get Dreyfus to budge, but by his estimations, “on some nine occasions, I said to them: ‘What do you want?’”

“I’m disappointed that on every occasion, when I asked Mr Dreyfus… to state what the Labor Party’s position was, [he] refused to do so.”

It was just last week that Dreyfus signalled a few tweaks that might encourage Labor to shift its stance – namely, assurances the public’s eventual decision would bypass the pollies and automatically become law or the removal of public funding from the vote – but neither of those options were tabled by the ALP in today’s meeting. 

In turn, Dreyfus said “the Attorney-General did not suggest anything that the Government is prepared to change.” Essentially, Australia’s two largest political forces played an elaborate game of “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours,” and both came away with sweet FA.

Perhaps both of ’em were too shy to pony up for fear of displaying some kind of political weakness. Perhaps Labor knows they’re in a position of power, so they’re using plebiscite concessions as some kind of bargaining chip. Best yet, maybe they really, truly, don’t want a massively expensive vote that’s been criticised in too many ways to list right here.

It seems there might be another meeting between the two before Parliament resumes, so watch this space. 

Source: ABC. 
Photo: Krystle Wright / Vince Caligiuri / Getty. 

More Stuff From PEDESTRIAN.TV