
Australian actor and staunch defender of body and sexual rights, Caitlin Stasey has sparked a row on through social media, taking aim at Fairfax Media publication Good Weekend Magazine over a proposed feature article that allegedly involved a nude photo shoot – one that was sprung on her without prior knowledge.
Good Weekend magazine suddenly doesn’t have the space to run a piece on me because I wouldn’t do a shoot in my underwear
@theage @smh
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
They wanted to team an interview about my upset over the constant objectification of women with a sexualized photo shoot. I declined.@theage
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
And miraculously, conveniently after I said I wouldn’t do it, they claimed the magazine was downsized & there was no space to run the piece
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
Photo shoot & story of any length would take up th same amount of space.So y th sudden change of heart wen I refused 2 b sexualised? @theage
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
U do understand the difference between a woman appearing naked on her own terms & one being coaxed to in order to sell your product?@theage
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
A woman appearing nude once, for her own purposes, does not have to bend to you willing her nude for yours @theage
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
Staggering to me, the arrogance of those who thought a shoot like that would b appropriate & THEN Having a tantrum when I refused! @theage
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
Smh @smh
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 15, 2015
Does anyone have anything to add? @smh @theage
Regrets? Apologies? Some semblance of a bullshit defence?
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
A ‘concept’ they never ran by me, that I never agreed to, that they sprung on me last second. You entitled cunts @smh pic.twitter.com/dgORJVthEh
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
The lead culprit being @BenNaparstek
Claiming (lying) that we had agreed to the vision board he had chosen.
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
You assumed I would pose nude for you. You told people you had cleared it with me and my team
@BenNaparstek pic.twitter.com/OkjpbWG3ir
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
Do nude photos miraculously take up less space?Is that y th issue of ‘space’ arose directly AFTER I told u I wouldnt pose nude @BenNaparstek
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
.@lucethoughts this is all true I have the emails and no reason to lie. They will claim ignorance and shift blame.
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
Expect a half ass apology absolving themselevs of any responsibility or wrong doing @smh @theage
— caitlin stasey (@caitlinstasey) July 16, 2015
Reporting by Crikey earlier this morning backed up Stasey’s claims that the concept for the shoot had not been run past her or her team, and that Naparstek had stated that the shoot would be pulled unless his intended brief went ahead.
“I totally understood and respected Caitlin’s decision not to pursue our shoot, which would have been a classy shoot with a leading American fashion photographer in line with the beautiful artistic imagery she’d published of herself on Herself.Com, which she’d just launched.”“We decided not to pursue the shoot when her agent offered us access to existing portraits instead. But with the Herself.Com peg no longer as strong, we decided to delay the profile until later in the year so it could be tied to the new seasons of her series Please Like Me and Reign. Apologies to Caitlin for any miscommunication.”