ICYM the shit-show of the last 24-hours, no less than 11 women have come forward with stories of sexual assault or inappropriate behaviour by Donald Trump.
QZ has a succinct summary of them over here, but the ones you need to know about for this story are the two accounts published by the New York Times of women who say Trump inappropriately touched them. (“He was like an octopus” – shudder.)
Within hours, Trump’s lawyer Marc E. Kasowitz sent a letter to the NY Times demanding an apology and a retraction, or legal action would be pursued.
“Your article is reckless, defamatory and constitutes libel per se,” Kasowitz wrote. “It is apparent from, among other things, the timing of the article, that it is nothing more than a politically motivated effort to defeat Mr. Trump’s candidacy.”
Trump is also having his usual meltdown on Twitter:
The phony story in the failing @nytimes is a TOTAL FABRICATION. Written by same people as last discredited story on women. WATCH!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 13, 2016
However, the NY Times’ lawyer David E. McCraw is unconcerned.
“You write concerning our article ‘Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately‘ and label the article as ‘libel per se’,” he writes. “You ask that we ‘remove it from (our) website, and issue a full and immediate retraction and apology.’We decline to do so.
“The essence of a libel claim, of course, is the protection of one’s reputation. Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women. He has bragged about intruding on beauty pageant contestants in their dressing rooms. He acquiesced to a radio host’s request to discuss Mr. Trump’s own daughter as a ‘piece of ass.’ Multiple women not mentioned in our article have publicly come forward to report on Mr. Trump’s unwanted advances. Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself.”
The letter continues:
“But there is a larger and much more important point here. The women quoted in our story spoke out on an issue of national importance — indeed, an issue that Mr. Trump himself discussed with the whole nation watching during Sunday night’s presidential debate. Our reporters diligently worked to confirm the women’s accounts. They provided readers with Mr. Trump’s response, including his forceful denial of the women’s reports. It would have been a disservice not just to our readers but to democracy itself to silence their voices. We did what the law allows: We published newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern. If Mr. Trump disagrees, if he believes that American citizens had no right to hear what these women had to say and that the law of this country forces us and those who would dare to criticise him to stand silent or be punished, we welcome the opportunity to have a court set him straight.”
Photo: Getty / Alex Wong.