‘Indigenous Communities Are A Lifestyle Choice’ Says Self-Appointed Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has responded to Western Australian Premier Colin Barnett’s decision to close nearly half of WA’s 274 remote Indigenous communities in a way that we can sadly only now consider textbook fashion

That is, by plumbing new depths of terrifying ignorance and ineptitude by remaining unrepentant in his defence of remarks he made yesterday which likened life in centuries old Indigenous communities to little more than “a lifestyle choice.”
A lifestyle choice. Eating kale is a lifestyle choice. Exclusively drinking craft beer is a lifestyle choice. Being Prime Minister is a lifestyle choice. Upholding and preserving tens and thousands of years of life and history tied indelibly to the land from which a culture derives its entire identity is not a lifestyle choice.

Abbott, who once appointed himself Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs during the 2013 federal election campaign, made the unbelievably trivial remarks while defending Barnett’s foreshadowing of the closure of 150 communities. Now that the responsibility to fund remote Indigenous settlements falls entirely on state governments (federal government provided two thirds of the required funding up until September last year), Barnett’s reasoning is that to continue to do so for all 274 communities is, unfortunately, no longer tenable. 

That considered, it’s an impressive feat of book balancing then that the federal government can somehow find a way to continue devoting, say, $243.8 million (over four years) of funding to lifestyle choices like the National School Chaplaincy Program.

 

Here are the Prime Minister’s remarks in full:
“What we can’t do is endlessly subsidise lifestyle choices if those lifestyle choices are not conducive to the kind of full participation in Australian society that everyone should have.


If people choose to live miles away from where there’s a school, if people choose not to access the school of the air, if people choose to live where there’s no jobs, obviously it’s very, very difficult to close the gap


It is not unreasonable for the state government to say if the cost of providing services in a particular remote location is out of all proportion to the benefits being delivered. Fine, by all means live in a remote location, but there’s a limit to what you can expect the state to do for you if you want to live there.”

Abbott’s remarks coincide with his rebuke of the United Nations, a report from which earlier this week found that Australia is directly violating the rights of asylum seekers and children in mandatory detention while contravening the UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

These latest remarks would then also appear to contravene segments of the UN’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, one article from which [Article 8] breaks it down in very simple terms:  
“Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be
subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and
redress for:  

(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them
of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values
or ethnic identities; 
(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing
them of their lands, territories or resources; 
(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim
or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;
(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;
(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite
racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.”
For your consideration, another clause [Article 25] also goes on to state that: 
“Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied and used lands, territories, waters and coastal seas and other resources and to uphold their responsibilities to future generations in this regard.”
There’s a great deal more which you can read here; however, here’s hoping you already well and truly get the point. 
Leaders from both the Opposition and Greens parties are today demanding Abbott apologise to traditional land owners for his continued insistence on the validity of the remarks. Labor’s spokesman on Indigenous affairs, Shayne Neumanntold the Guardian Australia that Abbott’s comments were “deeply disturbing and highly offensive”, adding to the ABC that “[Abbott] is saying that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be evicted from the lands on which they’ve lived for millennia… Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have had more than 200 years of dispossession, dislocation and disadvantage and the Prime Minister wants to perpetuate this.” 
It’s a sentiment echoed by WA Greens senator Rachel Siewert, who described the comments as “unbelievably racist and completely out of touch. The cultures that exist within these communities are thousands of years old and stretch far beyond the Prime Minister’s bizarre idea of a ‘lifestyle choice’“. 

Even Abbott’s own advisor on Indigenous affairs, Warren Mundine, has also given a statement to Fairfax stating outright that the PM’s comments are straight up “wrong.” 

“It is not about a lifestyle, it is not like retiring and moving for a sea change. It is about thousands of years’ connection, their religious beliefs and the essence of who they are.” 
The only ‘lifestyle choice’ being exhibited here is that of our government’s continued insistence on enacting legislation that denies the fundamental rights of Australia’s Indigenous population while downplaying their status as the original inhabitants of this land for some 60,000 years prior to the kind of bigoted, embarrassingly dickheaded and utterly deranged ‘lifestyle choices’ of the kind that lead us to this shameful discussion today.

Photo Mark Graham/AFP/Getty Images

via The ABCGuardianSMH

More Stuff From PEDESTRIAN.TV