Holy Shit, A Manus Island Detainee Just Asked Turnbull Why He’s Still There

Tonight, a week after Opposition Leader Bill Shorten quite confidently took to the Q&A set, a flu-addled Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull took a seat beside Tony Jones in Brisbane. 

It was an up-and-down affair for the PM from the get-go. Questions about possible kowtowing to the far right of the Liberal party were met with obvious bloviation. 

Next, a rock-solid answer: the man said his government would never, ever privatise Medicare, which goes against the rumblings presented by Labor. 

Then, it happened. After answering questions relating to Australia’s commitment to mental health, a video came through. From Manus Island.

Behrouz Boochani, an Iranian Kurdish writer, beamed onto the set’s backdrop. It was revealed he fled the nation due to persecution of his work, but was found to meet the requirements for refugee status. 

Speaking to the Prime Minister, his questions were simple: “what is my crime,” and “why am I still in this illegal prison after three years?”
 


The exchange that followed made Turnbull’s commitment to the government’s border protection policy seem like a pained choice. 

After rattling off the same statistics on people smugglers the nation has heard many times before, he admitted “it is a tough policy, I grant you that. 

It is a harsh policy. But in government and in politics, often you are presented with tough choices. And the alternative is not a theoretical one.”
Just after, in response to whether he would visit the facility, Turnbull said “none of us have hearts of stone. All of us understand how harsh it is, our policy is, in terms of its impact in terms of particular individuals.”
“Of course, the gentleman we referred to there, he has other options as well. [He] doesn’t just have to come to Australia.

The thing we know, the alternative, if we abandon the strong defence of our border…”
And then it was back to our regularly scheduled programming of slamming Labor. 
It’s worth noting in this exchange that the nebulous option of what Boochani could choose to do probably referred to… going back to Iran, which is the exact place he needed to flee from. 

Also worth noting: the Prime Minister never answered what his crime was. Granted, the question was sprung on him (and on us), but his response demonstrated a continual reliance on the party line – numbers, statistics, and Labor – over, God forbid, specifically addressing an individual’s struggle. 

So, Behrouz, you’ve had your Q, but you might need to wait on that A. Sorry.

Really. Sorry. 

Source and photo: Q&A / ABC. 

More Stuff From PEDESTRIAN.TV