A New Celebrity-Backed Safe Schools Alternative Is Copping Serious Flak

In an effort to side-step the criticisms hurled against Safe Schools, including furious claims that it was too heavily focused on ideology than actually stemming violence against kids, the new proposed measures focus on a “tolerance and mutual respect of LGBTI people.”

While the new proposal is obviously aimed at being a more palatable to conservative lawmakers who took umbrage with certain elements of the Safe School program, critics have already characterised the letter as a huge step backwards.

Activist and GetUp! communications director Sally Rugg has responded to the campaign by saying “1950s tolerance bullshit is offensive, completely tone-deaf and detrimental to the campaign.” Rugg also described the influence of “privileged, cisgender celebrities” in a program which would also cover vulnerable transgender children as “some Kendall Jenner bullshit.”

Yo @missyhiggins @troyesivan @joelcreasey your open letter is horrifying-what consultation with LGBTI activists/community did you undertake?

— Sally Rugg (@sallyrugg) May 1, 2017

Rugg had previously summarised her take on the issue by saying ” [Safe Schools] is also there to make sure straight, cisgender kids understand that people with different sexualities and gender identities aren’t wrong or bad or lesser. Because they aren’t.”

Promoting “tolerance,” as the new campaign puts it, certainly doesn’t seem like it’s entirely in line with that goal.

Benjamin Riley, a Melbourne-based journo whose work focuses on queer issues, has also said the letter’s focus on tolerance “misses the mark” by “framing any other goal as ‘too radical’.”

@macleanbrendan It smacks of a group of very well-meaning but disconnected people.

— Benjamin Riley (@bencriley) May 2, 2017

That perspective has been mirrored, too.

that’s what this sounds like hey. please tolerate us gays and we’ll let you pretend trans kids don’t exist

— Bec Shaw (@Brocklesnitch) May 1, 2017

besides this aspect, & the tolerance shit, there (i assume) was no consultation with activists & experts working their guts out on this

— Bec Shaw (@Brocklesnitch) May 1, 2017

You can check out the proposal in full, and have a look at the full list of big-name signatories, right HERE.