Chanel Is Selling A $2K Boomerang That We Hope To Christ Doesn't Come Back
SUBSCRIBE FREE TO PEDESTRIAN DAILY
FRIENDSHIP ACTIVATED!
Time for a little word association. When we say "respectful for Indigenous Australian culture," the first thing that pops to mind is "high-end designer fashion label," clearly.
Chanel, of all bloody companies, recently launched its Spring-Summer Pre-Collection for 2017, which is a hell of a title. In amongst the myriad of standard fashion regalia, Chanel has put out a baffling line of "other accessories," all of which are a) gaudy, b) exorbitantly expensive, and c) mystifying in concept. Why anyone in their right mind would drop AUD$570 on a set of four Chanel tennis balls in a leather pouch is beyond me.
But in amongst the line - which includes things like a tennis racquet, a surf/paddle board, and a set of beach racquets - is this.

A Chanel-branded boomerang. Because nothing say "capitalism is good, actually" quite like blatant cultural appropriation of an indigenous people halfway around the world.
The boomerang, which retails at a hefty $1,930 if you don't freakin' mind, is made from "wood & resin" and is an extremely real thing that you can actually buy, as makeup/YouTube person Jeffree Star plainly exhibited in his Snapchat feed overnight.
This isn't the first time Chanel's produced a boomerang as part of their lines, either. It would appear that they've been selling a boomerang in one form or another for a solid few years now. In this day of social media and consumer-lead accountability, it feels like a big oversight that this one's constantly gone through to the keeper.How extra is @JeffreeStar ? Extra enough to have a Chanel boomerang ???? pic.twitter.com/7ZOP2Dk4Gp
— Zackeriah?? (@z__hudson) May 15, 2017
The discovery of the boomerang has lead to some (quite rightfully) wrinkled brows on the online.
When I think about Aboriginal culture, I think @chanel https://t.co/ocZSljGkPW
— Nayuka Gorrie (@NayukaGorrie) May 15, 2017
Where's??my ??Chanel??coolamon???? https://t.co/GFRMWrxejJ
— alison whittaker (@AJ_Whittaker) May 15, 2017
Um nope. https://t.co/0eNNyGJORN
— Debbie Lunchmeat (@LouisaHarrison) May 15, 2017
It doesn't really matter which way you look at this. It is ah... not good.Have decided to save for the next three years so I can connect with my culture via @CHANEL https://t.co/ocZSljGkPW
— Nayuka Gorrie (@NayukaGorrie) May 15, 2017
Not good at all.
Source: Chanel.com.
Photos: Chanel.com.