Women stand to benefit from changes to penalty rates. Underemployment disproportionately affects women. #BeBoldForChange pic.twitter.com/N7Hb5GhIbR
— Australian Chamber (@AusChamber) March 8, 2017
“In retail and hospitality the economics are very clear, it’s the amount of consumer spending that determines whether a store will stay open and you cannot increase demand by contributing lower level wages.“This is not going to suddenly encourage more stores and restaurants to open on Sundays, all its going to do is impose a bit more hardship on people whose incomes were already inadequate.”
@AusChamber Your logic is disingenuous at best & you celebrate cutting women’s pay on #IWD2017? Back inside your cave.
— Sandi Logan (@SandiHLogan) March 8, 2017
@AusChamber Now they can be underemployed and underpaid at the same time Bravo
— Socialist Wombat (@3wombats) March 8, 2017
@AusChamber tldr paying women less will help women happy women’s day
— Nick Names Nuts (@nicknamesnuts) March 8, 2017
.@AusChamber me thinking how paying women less is a good thing pic.twitter.com/NIF0PzdRM5
— )))TG o((( (@TG_Chrono) March 8, 2017
@AusChamber counterpoint, women will still be underemployed just paid less to work at inconvenient times.
— Jacob King (@jamaising) March 8, 2017
.@AusChamber unless this is intentional self-parody, you should strongly consider deleting your account
— Scott Ludlam (@SenatorLudlam) March 8, 2017