Australia’s peak television authority may have just given Andrew Bolt the biggest back-handed tick of approval he’ll ever receive.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) have deemed some of Bolt’s statements on climate change so deliriously overblown and subjective, that complaints made against The Bolt Report’s inaccuracy in 2015 have been dismissed.
We shit you not, ACMA have stated that Bolt’s audience really should have recognised his cherrypicking of data from a graph as nothing more than a subjective take – rather than a legitimate presentation of scientific facts.
Omitted from the broadcast was the portion of the graph showing rising temperatures between 1979 to 1997. That lil’ caveat caught the attention of one Waleed Aly, who proceeded to wail on Bolt’s knowing befuddlement of the facts by asking the dude who actually created the graph to give his take:
But good Lord, if your argument for viewers to choose “facts above fear” is so demonstrably opinionated it’s deemed nonfactual itself… Perhaps you need a different argument. Especially about something as critically important as climate change.